© 2007 European Society of Cardiology
International variations in the treatment and co-morbidity of left ventricular systolic dysfunction: Data from the EuroHeart Failure Survey
aka,*
a Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital Murska Sobota Dr. Vrbnjaka 6, SI-9000 Murska Sobota, Slovenia
b Department of Cardiology University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull, UK
c Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center Thoraxcenter, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
d Department of Medicine University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
e Department of Cardiology Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière, Paris, France
f Department of Medicine Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Göteborg, Sweden
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +386 31379533; fax: +386 25221007. E-mail address: mitja.lainscak{at}guest.arnes.si
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Background: Treatment of heart failure (HF) due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) is effective, but many patients are not treated in accordance with guidelines. This may reflect a lack of adequate organisation of care or co-morbidity contra-indicating therapy.
Aims: To evaluate the effect of co-morbidities on the prescription of neurohormonal antagonists for HF.
Methods and results: The EuroHeart Failure Survey identified 10,701 patients with suspected or confirmed HF during 2000 and 2001, 64% of whom had an imaging test and 3658 had documented LVSD. This last group constitutes the focus of this report. Renal dysfunction was associated with lower prescription of ACE inhibitors at discharge (74% vs. 83%, p<0.001). Beta-blockers were less often used in patients with respiratory disease (32% vs. 53%, p<0.001). Co-morbidity did not appear to affect the use of spironolactone. There were few important international differences in uptake of key therapies amongst European countries with widely differing cultures and economic status.
Conclusions: Guidelines appear successful in creating a relatively uniform approach to the treatment for HF due to LVSD in diverse medical cultures. Relevant co-morbidity seems to be responsible for a substantial reduction in the prescription of ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers. However, whilst co-morbidity indicates the need for greater caution, it is often not a valid contra-indication to life-saving therapy.
Key Words: Heart failure • Left ventricular systolic dysfunction • Medical treatment • Co-morbidity • Prognosis
Received November 22, 2005; Revised June 14, 2006; Accepted July 18, 2006
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Lainscak, H.-D. Duengen, and S. D. Anker Beta-Blockers in Elderly Patients With Heart Failure: Ready for Prime Time? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2009; 54(23): 2202 - 2202. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. J. van Veldhuisen, A. H. Maass, S. G. Priori, P. Stolt, I. C. van Gelder, K. Dickstein, and K. Swedberg Implementation of device therapy (cardiac resynchronization therapy and implantable cardioverter defibrillator) for patients with heart failure in Europe: changes from 2004 to 2008 Eur J Heart Fail, December 1, 2009; 11(12): 1143 - 1151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J Calvert, A. Shankar, R. J McManus, R. Ryan, and N. Freemantle Evaluation of the management of heart failure in primary care Fam. Pract., April 1, 2009; 26(2): 145 - 153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. de Groote, R. Isnard, P. Clerson, G. Jondeau, M. Galinier, P. Assyag, N. Demil, A. Ducardonnet, J.-F. Thebaut, and M. Komajda Improvement in the management of chronic heart failure since the publication of the updated guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology: The Impact-Reco Programme Eur J Heart Fail, January 1, 2009; 11(1): 85 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|