Skip Navigation

European Journal of Heart Failure 2006 8(2):187-190; doi:10.1016/j.ejheart.2005.06.007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lainscak, M.
Right arrow Articles by Keber, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lainscak, M.
Right arrow Articles by Keber, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 European Society of Cardiology

Patients' knowledge and beta blocker treatment improve prognosis of patients from a heart failure clinic

Mitja Lainscaka,* and Irena Keberb

a General Hospital Murska Sobota, Internal Medicine Department Dr. Vrbnjaka 6, SI-9000 Murska Sobota, Slovenia
b University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Vascular Disease Department Ljubljana, Slovenia

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +38 631379533; fax: +38 625211007. E-mail address: mitja.lainscak{at}guest.arnes.si


   Abstract

Background: Several studies have shown improvement of prognosis in patients managed in heart failure (HF) clinics. However, the value of the individual management components is not well established.

Aim: To assess the prognostic value of pharmacological treatment and patient's knowledge in patients receiving care in a HF clinic.

Methods and results: In our prospective cohort study we followed 115 patients (50 from an HF clinic and 65 receiving usual care) for at least 12 months. Knowledge was assessed using a Patient Knowledge Questionnaire (PKQ). During a median follow-up of 561 days, fewer patients from the HF clinic died or were rehospitalized due to HF than those receiving usual care (42% vs. 65%, p=0.016). The prescription rates of ACE inhibitors (94% to 98%) and beta blockers (40% to 94%) increased in the patients from the HF clinic. In these patients the PKQ score also increased from 4.8 (1.5) to 7.9 (1.3), p<0.001. In the Cox proportional hazard model, treatment with beta blockers at ≥50% of the target daily dose (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.3, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.10—0.95) and a PKQ score <7 (HR 3.92, 95% CI 1.39—11.03) predicted prognosis in the patients from the HF clinic.

Conclusions: Patient management in the HF clinic reduced the incidence of death or of HF rehospitalization. Poor prognosis of patients receiving care in the HF clinic was predicted by poor patient knowledge and underdosing with beta blockers.

Key Words: Heart failure • Mortality • Rehospitalization • Knowledge • Beta blockers

Received December 12, 2004; Revised May 24, 2005; Accepted June 17, 2005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
J. Farkas, S. Nabb, L. Zaletel-Kragelj, J. G.F. Cleland, and M. Lainscak
Self-rated health and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure
Eur J Heart Fail, May 1, 2009; 11(5): 518 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
M. Lainscak, J. G.F. Cleland, M. J. Lenzen, S. Nabb, I. Keber, F. Follath, M. Komajda, and K. Swedberg
Recall of lifestyle advice in patients recently hospitalised with heart failure: A EuroHeart Failure Survey analysis
Eur J Heart Fail, November 1, 2007; 9(11): 1095 - 1103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
M Gary Nicholls, A Mark Richards, and Christchurch Cardioendocrine Research Group
Disease monitoring of patients with chronic heart failure
Heart, April 1, 2007; 93(4): 519 - 523.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.