Skip Navigation

European Journal of Heart Failure 2005 7(5):852-858; doi:10.1016/j.ejheart.2005.01.019
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thune, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thune, J. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 European Society of Cardiology

Different prognostic impact of systolic function in patients with heart failure and/or acute myocardial infarction

Jens Jakob Thunea,*, Christian Carlsena, Pernille Buchb, Marie Seibæka, Hans Burchardtb, Christian Torp-Pedersenb, Lars Købera and on behalf of the DIAMOND investigators

a Department of Cardiology, B2141, The Heart Centre University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark
b Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospital of Copenhagen Bispebjerg Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 21, DK-2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +45 35 45 28 74; fax: +45 35 45 34 53. E-mial address: jjt{at}heart.dk


   Abstract

Aims: To study the prognostic importance of left ventricular systolic function in patients with heart failure (HF) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with respect to the presence of prior heart failure and known ischemic heart disease.

Methods: In 13,084 consecutive patients diagnosed with either AMI or HF, a medical history and an echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular systolic function by wall motion index (WMI) were obtained. Patients were divided into four groups: AMI with or without a history of HF, and primary HF (no recent AMI) with or without a history of ischemic heart disease (IHD). Mortality was assessed after nine years of follow-up.

Results: WMI stratified patients according to all-cause mortality in all four groups of patients (p< 0.0001). For a decrease in WMI of 0.3 (corresponding to a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.1), the hazard ratio was 1.61 (95% CI:1.48–1.76) for AMI patients without prior HF, 1.43 (1.38–1.48) for AMI patients with prior HF, 1.26 (1.22–1.30) for primary HF patients with IHD and 1.23 (1.18–1.27) for HF patients without IHD.

Conclusion: WMI stratifies patients with IHD and/or HF according to risk of all-cause death. The presence of HF attenuates the prognostic power of WMI.

Key Words: Ejection fraction • Chronic heart failure • Acute myocardial infarction • Wall motion index • Epidemiology

Received August 24, 2004; Revised December 20, 2004; Accepted January 27, 2005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.