Skip Navigation

European Journal of Heart Failure 2005 7(4):631-639; doi:10.1016/j.ejheart.2004.10.015
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edes, I.
Right arrow Articles by Wita, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edes, I.
Right arrow Articles by Wita, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 European Society of Cardiology

Effects of nebivolol on left ventricular function in elderly patients with chronic heart failure: results of the ENECA study{star}

Istvan Edesa,*, Zbigniew Gasiorb and Krystian Witab

a Institute of Cardiology, University of Debrecen 4004 Debrecen, P.O.B.: 1, Hungary
b Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice Poland

* Corresponding author. Tel./Fax: +36 52 414 928. E-mail address: edes{at}jaguar.unideb.hu


   Abstract

Aim: To examine the effect of the beta1-selective beta-blocker nebivolol, administered as add-on therapy, on left ventricular function in 260 elderly patients (>65 years) with chronic heart failure (CHF).

Methods: The principal inclusion criteria were (1) NYHA class II–IV CHF and (2) a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%. The primary end-point was the change in LVEF in response to nebivolol treatment for 8 months.

Results: Baseline LVEF values in the two groups were as follows: nebivolol 25.41±7.09% and control 26.41±5.55%. LVEF improved significantly (p=0.027) more in the nebivolol group (6.51±9.15%) than in the control group (3.97±9.20%), the relative improvement (percentage increase in the initial value) being 35.70±57.62% in the nebivolol group and 19.19±40.96% (p=0.008) in the placebo group. Examination of different subgroups did not reveal any heterogeneity in the effects of nebivolol treatment vs. placebo treatment. There were no significant differences between the nebivolol and placebo groups as concerns the changes in clinical status, quality of life, or safety parameters.

Conclusion: The findings of the ENECA study confirmed that nebivolol significantly improved cardiac function and proved to be safe and well tolerated in elderly patients with signs of CHF and an impaired LVEF.

Key Words: Nebivolol • Chronic heart failure • Ejection fraction • Left ventricular function

Received May 5, 2004; Revised September 1, 2004; Accepted October 18, 2004


{star} Sponsorship: This study was sponsored by the Berlin-Chemie AG, Menarini Group, Berlin, Germany.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ther Adv Cardiovasc DisHome page
A. Maffei and G. Lembo
Nitric oxide mechanisms of nebivolol
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, August 1, 2009; 3(4): 317 - 327.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
F. A. McAlister, N. Wiebe, J. A. Ezekowitz, A. A. Leung, and P. W. Armstrong
Meta-analysis: {beta}-Blocker Dose, Heart Rate Reduction, and Death in Patients With Heart Failure
Ann Intern Med, June 2, 2009; 150(11): 784 - 794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
C. L. Gray and U. A. Ndefo
Nebivolol: A new antihypertensive agent
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., June 15, 2008; 65(12): 1125 - 1133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
A. Veverka, D. S Nuzum, and J. L Jolly
Nebivolol: A Third-Generation {beta}-Adrenergic Blocker
Ann. Pharmacother., July 1, 2006; 40(7): 1353 - 1360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.