Skip Navigation

European Journal of Heart Failure 2004 6(3):309-312; doi:10.1016/j.ejheart.2003.12.014
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wu, A. H.B.
Right arrow Articles by Maisel, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wu, A. H.B.
Right arrow Articles by Maisel, A. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 European Society of Cardiology

Reduced readmission rate for alternating diagnoses of heart failure and pulmonary disease after implementation of B-type natriuretic peptide testing

Alan H.B. Wua,*, Alex Harrisonb and Alan S. Maiselb

a Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hartford Hospital 80 Seymour St., Hartford, CT 06102, USA
b Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of California at San Diego San Diego, CA, USA

* Corresponding author. Fax: +1-860-545-3733 E-mail adrress: awu{at}harthosp.org


   Abstract

Background: Patients with heart failure (HF) or pulmonary diseases (PD) present with similar symptoms. Effective disease management requires an accurate diagnosis. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is increased in patients with HF and is normal in PD patients without cardiac involvement.

Objective: To determine if the readmission rate for patients with either HF or PD who later present with the alternate diagnosis (PD or HF) is decreased with the implementation of BNP testing at one hospital.

Methods: We retrospectively determined the impact of BNP testing on reducing diagnostic ambiguities for patients admitted to an emergency department (ED) with these diseases. We compared a HF DRG (Diagnostic Related Group) (#428) and PD DRGs (#480–496) before vs. 1 and 2 y after implementation of BNP testing.

Results: In a 12-month period before BNP, there were 42 total visits (15 cases) where a patient presented with a HF DRG and returned within 6 months with a PD DRG, and 41 visits (14 cases) where there was a PD->HF readmission. One year after BNP implementation, the corresponding number of visits decreased 52% to 20 visits (15 cases) for HF->PD, and 73% to 11 visits (8 cases) for PD->HF readmissions. A similar reduction in readmissions was observed in the second year after BNP testing. The total number of HF and PD cases in 1999 (1029 patients) was similar to 2001 (985), and was higher in 2002 (1350) during these time intervals. The ED length-of-stay (LOS) was slightly higher for the HF->PD cases with BNP testing, whereas there was no change in LOS for the PD->HF cases.

Conclusion: We hypothesize that prior to BNP implementation, there may have been diagnostic ambiguities in the initial diagnosis of HF or PD, which contributed to a repeat visit for the alternate diagnosis (PD or HF). With BNP testing, the apparent number of inappropriate visits decreased. Reducing unnecessary ED admissions helps justify the costs for implementing BNP testing in the hospital.

Key Words: B-type natriuretic peptide • Heart failure • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease • Cost effective • Inappropriate admissions

Received December 10, 2003; Accepted December 15, 2003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.