Skip Navigation

European Journal of Heart Failure 2002 4(3):289-295; doi:10.1016/S1388-9842(01)00236-7
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Houghton, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hampton, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Houghton, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hampton, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2002 European Society of Cardiology

Assessing exercise capacity, quality of life and haemodynamics in heart failure: do the tests tell us the same thing?

Andrew R. Houghton*, Maxine Harrison, Alan J. Cowley and John R. Hampton

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine University Hospital, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK

* Corresponding author. Department of Cardiology, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK. Tel.: +44-116-287-1471; fax: +44-116-250-2405. E-mail address: arhoughton{at}btinternet.com


   Abstract

Background: The objective measurement of exercise tolerance is an important component of heart failure trials. The use of laboratory-based treadmill exercise testing has attracted criticism, however, as being unrepresentative of patients’ true capabilities.

Aim: To examine the relationships between tests of exercise capacity, quality of life and haemodynamics in patients with stable symptomatic heart failure.

Methods: Thirty-six patients with mild–moderate chronic heart failure were studied. Exercise capacity was assessed in the laboratory by maximal treadmill tests and self-paced corridor walk tests, and in the patients’ homes by hip-borne pedometers. Quality of life was assessed by a disease-specific questionnaire. Cardiac output and limb blood flow were measured by non-invasive techniques.

Results: Customary activity as assessed by pedometer scores correlated with quality of life questionnaire scores (rS=0.47, P=0.04), and both variables correlated with limb (calf) blood flow (pedometer scores: rS=0.39, P=0.03; quality of life scores: rS=0.50, P=0.04). The laboratory-based maximal treadmill test correlated with the self-paced corridor walk test, but neither of these tests correlated with pedometer scores, quality of life or haemodynamics.

Conclusions: Different methods of assessing exercise capacity do not appear to give comparable results and bear different relationships to haemodynamic variables and quality of life. Pedometer scores of customary activity may better reflect patients’ quality of life and appear to be more closely related to limb blood flow than the maximal treadmill exercise test or the corridor walk test. The sole use of laboratory-based exercise tests in therapeutic trials may give a misleading assessment of treatment efficacy in heart failure patients.

Key Words: Heart failure • Exercise capacity • Quality of life • Haemodynamics

Received June 7, 2001; Revised September 3, 2001; Accepted October 23, 2001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
R. J van den Berg-Emons, J. B Bussmann, A. H Balk, and H. J Stam
Factors Associated With the Level of Movement-Related Everyday Activity and Quality of Life in People With Chronic Heart Failure
Physical Therapy, December 1, 2005; 85(12): 1340 - 1348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.