Skip Navigation

European Journal of Heart Failure 2001 3(5):569-576; doi:10.1016/S1388-9842(01)00170-2
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nicolau, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ramires, J. A.F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nicolau, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ramires, J. A.F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2001 European Society of Cardiology

Prognosis of acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era: medical evaluation is still valuable

José C. Nicolaua,*, Carlos V. Serrano, Jr.a, Sérgio A.C. Garzonb and José A.F. Ramiresa

a Heart Institute (InCor),University of São Paulo Medical School Brazil
b Instituto de Moléstias Cardiovasculares São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil

* Corresponding author. Rua Aureliano Coutinho 355-14° andar, São Paulo, SP 01224-020, Brazil. Tel.: 55-11-3069-5058; fax: +55-11-3088-3809. E-mail address: corjnicolau{at}incor.usp.br (J.C. Nicolau)


   Abstract

Background: Modern and sophisticated technology for the management of myocardial infarction has progressively devalued medical evaluation.

Hypothesis: This study was undertaken to assess the importance of the findings of medical evaluation at hospital presentation, in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Methods: Data from 590 thrombolytic-treated myocardial infarction patients were analyzed. The patients were grouped according to their clinical status on arrival at hospital. A modified Forrester classification — subset II was divided according to the absence (IIa) or presence (IIb) of symptoms — was applied. Short- (14 days) and long-term (up to 10 years) survival was analyzed and 19 independent variables were included in the multivariate models.

Results: Short-term survival was 95.6% for subset I, 83.3% for subset IIa, 60% for subset IIb, 54.6% for subset III, and 34.8% for subset IV (P < 0.001). By multiple regression analysis, lower clinical subsets (P < 0.001), fewer coronary arteries with disease (P = 0.006), younger age (P = 0.014), absence of reinfarction (P = 0.034), longer interval between streptokinase infusion and coronary arteriography (P = 0.016), and higher left ventricular ejection fraction (P = 0.037) demonstrated significant and independent correlation with short-term survival. Long-term survival for the total population was 71 ± 3.6% for subset I, 54.4 ± 8.5% for subset IIa, 20.8 ± 9.4% for subset IIb, 54.5 ± 15% for subset III, and 0% for subset IV (P < 0.001). Using Cox regression analysis, lower clinical subsets (P < 0.001), younger age (P < 0.001), higher global left ventricular ejection fraction (P < 0.001), and fewer coronary arteries with disease (P = 0.021) correlated independently and significantly with long-term survival. When excluding data from patients who died before the short-term follow-up (n = 532), lower clinical subsets remained an important predictor of long-term survival (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Clinical classification at hospital presentation is a powerful predictor of short- and long-term survival post-myocardial infarction.

Key Words: Acute myocardial infarction • Medical evaluation • Long-term follow-up • Thrombolysis

Received September 19, 2000; Revised December 12, 2000; Accepted January 19, 2001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.