Skip Navigation

European Journal of Heart Failure 2001 3(3):343-349; doi:10.1016/S1388-9842(01)00126-X
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stoschitzky, K.
Right arrow Articles by Klein, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stoschitzky, K.
Right arrow Articles by Klein, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2001 European Society of Cardiology

Differing beta-blocking effects of carvedilol and metoprolol

Kurt Stoschitzky*, Gergana Koshucharova, Robert Zweiker, Robert Maier, Norbert Watzinger, Friedrich M. Fruhwald and Werner Klein

Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Abteilung für Kardiologie Graz, Austria

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +43-3163852544; fax: +43-3163853733 E-mail address: kurt.stoschitzky{at}kfunigraz.ac.at (K. Stoschitzky).


   Abstract

Background: Metoprolol is a beta1-selective beta-adrenergic antagonist while carvedilol is a non-selective beta-blocker with additional blockades of alpha1-adrenoceptors. Administration of metoprolol has been shown to cause up-regulation of beta-adrenoceptor density and to decrease nocturnal melatonin release, whereas carvedilol lacks these typical effects of beta-blocking drugs.

Aims: To compare beta-blocking effects of metoprolol and carvedilol when applied orally in healthy subjects.

Methods: We investigated the effects of single oral doses of clinically recommended amounts of metoprolol (50, 100 and 200 mg) and carvedilol (25, 50 and 100 mg) to those of a placebo in a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study in 12 healthy male volunteers. Two hours after oral administration of the drugs heart rate and blood pressure were measured at rest, after 10 min of exercise, and after 15 min of recovery.

Results: Metoprolol tended to decrease heart rate during exercise (–21%, –25% and –24%) to a greater extent than carvedilol (–16%, –16% and –18%). At rest, increasing doses of metoprolol caused decreasing heart rates (62, 60 and 58 beats/min) whereas increasing doses of carvedilol caused increasing heart rates (62, 66 and 69 beats/min), 50 and 100 mg carvedilol failed to differ significantly from the placebo (71 beats/min).

Conclusions: We conclude that clinically recommended doses of carvedilol cause a clinically relevant beta-blockade in humans predominantly during exercise where it appears to be slightly (although not significantly) less effective than metoprolol. On the other hand, the effects of carvedilol on heart rate at rest appear rather weak, particularly in subjects with a low sympathetic tone. This might be caused by a reflex increase on sympathetic drive secondary to peripheral vasodilation resulting from the alpha-blocking effects of the drug. These results might be helpful in explaining why carvedilol, in contrast to metoprolol, may fail to cause up-regulation of beta-adrenoceptor density and does not decrease nocturnal melatonin release. This, in turn, may be a reason for the weak side-effects of carvedilol resulting from the beta-blockade. In addition, our data might be of interest in the interpretation of the forthcoming results of the COMET trial, although it has to be emphasised that they were derived from healthy subjects and, therefore, cannot be directly extrapolated to patients with heart failure.

Key Words: Carvedilol • Metoprolol • Beta-blockers • Heart failure • Melatonin

Received August 10, 2000; Revised November 8, 2000; Accepted January 17, 2001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
T. J. Vittorio, R. Zolty, M. E. Kasper, R. M. Khandwalla, D. S. Hirsh, C.-H. Tseng, U. P. Jorde, and K. Ahuja
Differential Effects of Carvedilol and Metoprolol Succinate on Plasma Norepinephrine Release and Peak Exercise Heart Rate in Subjects With Chronic Heart Failure
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2008; 13(1): 51 - 57.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. Hryniewicz, A. S. Androne, A. Hudaihed, and S. D. Katz
Comparative Effects of Carvedilol and Metoprolol on Regional Vascular Responses to Adrenergic Stimuli in Normal Subjects and Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
Circulation, August 26, 2003; 108(8): 971 - 976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.