Skip Navigation

European Journal of Heart Failure 2009 11(1):99-105; doi:10.1093/eurjhf/hfn007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jaarsma, T.
Right arrow Articles by Strömberg, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jaarsma, T.
Right arrow Articles by Strömberg, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2009. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

The European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour scale revised into a nine-item scale (EHFScB-9): a reliable and valid international instrument

Tiny Jaarsma1,*, Kristofer Franzén Årestedt2, Jan Mårtensson3, Kathleen Dracup4 and Anna Strömberg5

1 Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, University Medical Centre, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands
2 School of Human Sciences, University of Kalmar, Kalmar, Sweden
3 Department of Nursing Science, School of Nursing Sciences, Jönköping University and Unit of Research and Development in Primary Care, Jönköping, Sweden
4 School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
5 Department of Cardiology, Linköping University Hospital and Department of Medicine and Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden

* Corresponding author. Email: t.jaarsma{at}thorax.umcg.nl


   Abstract

Aims: Improved self-care is the goal of many heart failure (HF) management programmes. The 12-item European Heart Failure Self-Care Behaviour Scale (EHFScB scale) was developed and tested to measure patient self-care behaviours. It is now available in 14 languages. The aim of this study was to further determine reliability and validity of the EHFScB scale.

Methods and results: Data from 2592 HF patients (mean age 73 years, 63% male) from six countries were analysed. Internal consistency was determined by Cronbach’s alpha. Validity was established by (1) interviews with HF experts and with HF patients; (2) item analysis; (3) confirmatory factor analysis; and (4) analysing the relationship between the EHFScB scale and scales measuring quality of life and adherence. Internal consistency of the 12-item scale was 0.77 (0.71–0.85). After factor analyses and critical evaluation of both psychometric properties and content of separate items, a nine-item version was further evaluated. The reliability estimates for the total nine-item scale (EHFScB-9) was satisfactory (0.80) and Cronbach’s alpha varied between 0.68 and 0.87 in the different countries. One reliable subscale was defined (consulting behaviour) with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.85. The EHFScB-9 measures a different construct than quality of life (r = 0.18) and adherence (r = 0.37).

Conclusion: The 12-item EHFScB scale was revised into the nine-item EHFScB-9, which can be used as an internally consistent and valid instrument to measure HF-related self-care behaviour.

Key Words: Heart failure • Self-care • Instrument development

Received March 4, 2008; Revised September 1, 2008; Accepted September 1, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
A. M. Clark, C. N. Freydberg, F. A. McAlister, R. T. Tsuyuki, P. W. Armstrong, and L. A. Strain
Patient and informal caregivers' knowledge of heart failure: necessary but insufficient for effective self-care
Eur J Heart Fail, June 1, 2009; 11(6): 617 - 621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.