Skip Navigation

European Journal of Heart Failure 2008 10(7):696-702; doi:10.1016/j.ejheart.2008.05.001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cleland, J. G.F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cleland, J. G.F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 European Society of Cardiology

The prevalence and incidence of left bundle branch block in ambulant patients with chronic heart failure

Andrew L. Clark*, Kevin Goode and John G.F. Cleland

Department of Academic Cardiology, Castle Hill Hospital Castle Road, Cottingham, Hull, UK. HU16 5JQ, UK

* Corresponding author. Castle Hill Hospital, Castle Road, Cottingham, Hull, HU16 5JQ, UK. Tel.: +44 1482 624012. a.l.clark{at}hull.ac.uk (A.L. Clark).


   Abstract

Background: Approximately one third of patients with chronic heart failure have left bundle branch block (LBBB) on their 12-lead ECG.

Methods and results: 1418 consecutive patients (average (SD) age 70.5 (10.4) years; 74% male) first seen in a community heart failure clinic between December 2001 and June 2006 had a 12 lead electrocardiogram (ECG). 485 (34%) had a QRS duration ≥ 120ms. Patients with a broad QRS were older (72.2 v 69.3years), had worse left ventricular systolic function, were on a higher daily dose of diuretic and were more likely to be on amiodarone (14.4 v 7.1%).

12 lead ECG was available for 734 patients (52%) at 1year follow up. The QRS interval increased from 115.1ms at baseline to 117.6 (P<0.0001). There were 52 incident cases of LBBB, an incidence of 10.9%. The only predictors of incident LBBB were QRS duration at baseline and amiodarone use at baseline. The proportion of patients with LBBB increased from 34.0% at baseline to 36.7%, 37.7% and 42.3% at 1, 2 and 3 years follow up, respectively. Baseline LBBB was associated with a worse outcome (HR 1.25 (95% CI 1.01–1.55). New LBBB was an independent adverse prognostic feature (HR 2.09 (95% CI 1.17–3.73); P=0.013).

Conclusions: The crude incidence of LBBB is 10.9% in the first year of follow up in an unselected population of ambulatory outpatients with chronic stable heart failure. Ongoing care of patients with chronic heart failure should include a regular 12 lead electrocardiogram.

Key Words: Heart failure • Conduction • Prognosis

Received January 22, 2008; Revised April 8, 2008; Accepted May 1, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
R. M Cubbon and K. K A Witte
Cardiac resynchronisation therapy for chronic heart failure and conduction delay
BMJ, April 28, 2009; 338(apr28_2): b1265 - b1265.
[Full Text]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. G.F. Cleland, L. Tavazzi, J.-C. Daubert, A. Tageldien, and N. Freemantle
Cardiac resynchronization therapy are modern myths preventing appropriate use?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 17, 2009; 53(7): 608 - 611.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular MedicineHome page
J. McMurray, M. Petrie, K. Swedberg, M. Komajda, S. Anker, and R. Gardner
CHAPTER 23 Heart Failure
ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, January 1, 2009; 2(1): med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.