Skip Navigation

European Journal of Heart Failure 2008 10(10):1020-1025; doi:10.1016/j.ejheart.2008.08.001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erhardt, L.
Right arrow Articles by Soler-Soler, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Erhardt, L.
Right arrow Articles by Soler-Soler, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 European Society of Cardiology

Cardiologists' awareness and perceptions of guidelines for chronic heart failure. The ADDress your Heart survey

Leif Erhardta,*, Michel Komajdab, F.D. Richard Hobbsc and Jordi Soler-Solerd

a Lund University, Malmo University Hospital Malmö, Sweden
b Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere and University Pierre et Marie Curie Paris, France
c University of Birmingham, Birmingham United Kingdom
d Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Barcelona, Spain

* Corresponding author. Lund University, Altonagatan 5, 21138 Malmö, Sweden. Tel.: +46 40 240750; fax: +46 40 240751. E-mail address: Leif.Erhardt{at}telia.com (L. Erhardt).


   Abstract

Background: Several surveys show that patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) are sub-optimally managed and treatment guidelines are not implemented in clinical practice.

Aims: To investigate awareness and perceptions of the 2005 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for CHF.

Methods: 467 cardiologists from seven European countries completed an on-line interview using a validated, semi-structured questionnaire including questions about awareness and relevance of CHF guidelines. To assess agreement with ESC guidelines, three fictitious patient cases were presented and respondents' management choices compared with those of an expert panel based on the guidelines.

Results: Awareness of CHF guidelines was high, with 98% aware of any guideline and 65% aware of ESC guidelines. ESC guidelines were considered relevant (51%) or very relevant (38%) for guiding treatment decisions. Up to 92% of respondents perceived that they adhered to the ESC guidelines. For the patient cases, ≤25% made treatment recommendations that completely matched those formulated by the expert panel. Respondents considered patient compliance (52%) and guideline complexity (46%) major barriers to implementation.

Conclusion: Cardiologists reported high awareness of and a positive attitude towards ESC CHF guidelines. Provision of guidelines in a concise and accessible format is perceived as a key factor to improve implementation.

Key Words: Chronic heart failure • Treatment guidelines • Survey • Pharmacotherapy • Awareness • Perception • Clinical practice

Received September 10, 2007; Revised June 10, 2008; Accepted August 14, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Fam PractHome page
M. J Calvert, A. Shankar, R. J McManus, R. Ryan, and N. Freemantle
Evaluation of the management of heart failure in primary care
Fam. Pract., April 1, 2009; 26(2): 145 - 153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart Fail SupplHome page
M. Komajda
How well are we implementing evidence-based care?
Eur J Heart Fail Suppl, April 1, 2009; 8(suppl_1): i39 - i44.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.