European Journal of Heart Failure 2000 2(3):261-263; doi:10.1016/S1388-9842(00)00066-0
© 2000 European Society of Cardiology
Catecholamine levels in heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy and their relationship to the severity of heart failure
Ajit Kumar Agarwala,*,
Poothirikovil Venugopalana,
Ceryl Woodhouseb and
David de Bonoc
a Division of Cardiology, College of Medicine, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital Muscat, Sultanate of Oman
b Department of Biochemistry, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital Muscat, Sultanate of Oman
c Department of Cardiology, Glenfield General Hospital Leicester, UK
Received October 4, 1999; Revised January 10, 2000; Accepted February 16, 2000
 |
1. Background
|
|---|
Persistent sympathetic stimulation, a major factor responsible
for continuing myocardial injury and worsening chronic heart
failure due to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC), is reflected
in raised plasma catecholamine levels. Raised noradrenaline
levels quantify the sympathetic response and have been reported
to be of prognostic value
[1,
2]. Therapy with beta-blockade
improves outcome
[3]. Recently, Richards et al. have demonstrated
elevated levels of atrial natriuretic peptide, brain natriuretic
peptide (BNP) and/or noradrenaline in heart failure. In nearly
a quarter of their study patients having supramedian BNP but
inframedian levels of noradrenaline, carvedilol was able to
reduce the hospital admission rate for heart failure significantly
[4].
 |
2. Aims
|
|---|
The purpose of this study was to investigate the catecholamine
levels in an Omani population with stable chronic heart failure
due to IDC and to see if these related to the severity of heart
failure.
 |
3. Methods
|
|---|
Fifty-five patients with IDC diagnosed as per WHO criteria
[5] who were on treatment for chronic heart failure with diuretics,
angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and/or digoxin
formed the subject of this study. Clinical history was recorded
and the severity of heart failure assessed using the New York
Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification. Ischaemic
heart disease was excluded by coronary arteriography in all
patients. Blood samples were drawn after an 8-h period of rest
with the patient in a supine position for estimation of noradrenaline,
adrenaline and dopamine levels. Ten millilitres of blood was
collected in ethylene diamine triacetate (EDTA) tubes and transported
to the biochemistry laboratory protected from sunlight. Analysis
was performed using high-performance liquid chromatography with
electrochemical detection. The catecholamines were separated
on reverse phase columns and component retention and peak shape
were enhanced by adding ion-pairing reagents to the mobile phase.
The reference ranges for normotensive healthy Omani population
(data in file) were used as controls (noradrenaline, 164–2360
pmol/l; adrenaline, 152–542 pmol/l; and dopamine, 181–653
pmol/l). Patients were divided based on severity of symptoms
into Group A (NYHA class I and II) and Group B (NYHA class III
and IV). Levels of catecholamines in the two groups of patients
were compared using the Wilcoxon test. The investigation conforms
to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.
 |
4. Results
|
|---|
Patients were aged 18–70 years (median 50 years) with
34 males and 21 females (M:F=1.6:1). There were 39 patients
in Group A and 16 patients in Group B. The treatment profile
of patients in the two groups at the time of evaluation is given
in
Table 1. None of the patients were on beta-blocker therapy.
Noradrenaline levels were elevated in 46/55 (83.6%) patients
and adrenaline and dopamine in 32/55 (58%). The levels of catecholamines
in Group A and Group B were compared (
Table 2). The mean levels
of noradrenaline were higher in Group A, but the difference
was not statistically significant. A similar analysis with adrenaline
and dopamine levels in the two groups also failed to show significant
difference.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 2 Comparison of plasma catecholamine levels in Group A (NYHA class I and II) and Group B (class III and IV)
|
|
 |
5. Conclusion
|
|---|
Our study reaffirms raised catecholamine levels in heart failure.
An interesting observation, however, appeared that comparatively
higher levels of noradrenaline were recorded in patients with
mild heart failure, but the difference was not statistically
significant. Possible explanations for lower levels in severe
heart failure include decompensation and/or resetting of adrenergic
reflexes, inter-individual differences in sympathetic response,
varying degrees of activation of counter-regulatory mechanisms,
such as release of atrial natriuretic peptide, and negating
effect of ACEI therapy
[6]. The difference in the treatment
received by the two groups could also be an important contributing
factor. Although beta-blockers were not used in any of the patients,
a more aggressive use of ACEI in severe heart failure could
have lowered the catecholamine levels in Group B.
It is well established that catecholamine levels are elevated in chronic heart failure, their reduction by pharmacological or non-pharmacological means to effect patient survival was disputed until recently, when studies [7–9] demonstrated the significance of plasma noradrenaline levels and survival benefits. However, Anker in his review [10] opined against such benefit and stated that spot catecholamine estimation was of limited value. Reduction of catecholamine levels by beta-adrenergic blockade has been shown to account for the beneficial effects [11,12]. Two recently published studies (CIBIS II and MERIT-HF) have recorded significant survival benefits of beta-blocker therapy [13,14]. However, these did not investigate the effect of therapy on catecholamine levels.
Despite the fact that the neuroendocrine activation is an important component of chronic heart failure, its assessment neither forms part of the routine work up of patients with heart failure, nor is there such a recommendation in the guidelines set by recognised scientific authorities [15–17]. A survey conducted in Italian hospital cardiology units [18] showed that only less than 4% of patients undergo any kind of neuroendocrine assessment. This aspect merits review. Although our observation of comparatively high noradrenaline levels in mild heart failure did not reach statistical significance, the gathering evidence [4,19–21] suggests that monitoring of catecholamine levels and BNP in early stages of IDC be more widely used for its prognostic value. This will also help to use beta-blockade optimally in IDC.
 |
Notes
|
|---|
* College of Medicine, P.O. Box 35, PC 123, Muscat, Sultanate
of Oman. Tel.: +968-513355-3404; fax: +968-513419. E-mail address:
ajitka{at}hotmail.com (A.K. Agarwal).

 |
References
|
|---|
- Schofer J., Tews A., Ruhwedel H., Reimitz P.E., Mathey D.G. Myocardial noradrenaline content: a factor not considered up to now for the prognosis of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Z Kardiol (1989) 78:366–371.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Cohn J.N., Levine T.B., Olivari M.T., et al. Plasma noradrenaline as a guide to prognosis in patients with congestive heart failure. New Engl J Med (1984) 311:819–823.[Abstract]
- Anderson J.L., Lutz J.R., Gilbert E.M., et al. A randomized trial of low-dose beta-blockade therapy for idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol (1985) 55:471–475.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Richards-Richards A.M., Doughty R., Nicholls M.G., et al. Neurohumoral prediction from carvedilol in ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation (1999) 99:786–792.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Richardson P., McKenna W., Bristow M., et al. Report of the 1995 World Health Organization/International Society and Federation of Cardiology Task Force on the definition and classification of cardiomyopathies. Circulation (1996) 93:841–842.[Free Full Text]
- Kjekshus J, Sweedberg K, Snapinns S for the CONSENSUS Trial Group. Effect of Enalapril on long-term mortality in severe congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1992;69:103–107.
- Francis G, Cohn JN, Johnson G, Rector T, Goldman S, Simon A, for the V-HeFtVA Co-Operative Studies Group. Plasma norepinephrine, plasma renin activity, and congestive heart failure. Circulation 1993;87(Suppl VI):s140–s148.
- Benedict CR, Shelton B, Johnstone DE et al for the SOLVD Investigators. Prognostic significance of plasma noradrenaline in patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 1996;94:690–697.
- Francis GS, Cohn JN, Johnson G et al for the V-HeFT VA Co-Operative Studies Group. Plasma noradrenaline, plasma renin activity and congestive heart failure: relations to survival and the effects of therapy in V-HeFT II. Circulation 1993;87(Suppl VI):40–48.
- Anker S.D. Catecholamine levels and treatment in chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J (1998) 19(Suppl_F):F56–F61.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Newton G.E., Parker J.D. Acute effects of β1 selective and nonselective β-adrenergic receptor blockade on cardiac sympathetic activity in congestive heart failure. Circulation (1996) 94:353–358.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Paolisso G., Gambardella A., Marrawzzo G., et al. Metabolic and cardiovascular benefits deriving from beta-adrenergic blockade in chronic congestive heart failure. Am Heart J (1992) 123:103–110.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II (CBIS II): a randomised trial. Lancet 1999;353:9–13.
- Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF). Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure. Lancet 1999;353:2001–2007.
- ACC/AHA Task Force Heart Failure Guidelines. Guidelines for the evaluation and management of heart failure. Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure). J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26(Suppl 5):1376–1398.
- Eichhorn E.J., Bristow M.R. Practical guidelines for initiation of beta-adrenergic blockade in patients with chronic heart failure. Am J Cardiol (1997) 79:794–797.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- The Task Force of the Working Group on Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. The treatment of heart failure. Guidelines. Eur Heart J 1997;18:736–753.
- SEOSI Investigators. Survey on heart failure in Italian hospital cardiology units. Results of the SEOSI study. Eur Heart J 1997;18:1457–1464.
- Cleland G.F., Swedberg K. Carvedilol for heart failure, with care. Lancet (1996) 347:1199–1201.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Doughty R.N., Rodgers A., Sharpe N., MacMahon S. Effects of beta-blocker therapy on mortality in patients with heart failure. Eur Heart J (1997) 18:560–565.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Waagstein F, Bristow MR, Swedberg K et al. for Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy (MDC) Trial Study Group. Beneficial effects of metoprolol in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Lancet 1993;342:1441–1446.

CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Stawowy, F. Blaschke, P. Pfautsch, S. Goetze, F. Lippek, B. Wollert-Wulf, E. Fleck, and K. Graf
Increased myocardial expression of osteopontin in patients with advanced heart failure
Eur J Heart Fail,
March 1, 2002;
4(2):
139 - 146.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|