Skip Navigation



European Journal of Heart Failure Advance Access published online on November 4, 2009

European Journal of Heart Failure, doi:10.1093/eurjhf/hfp144
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/12/1195    most recent
hfp144v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsutamoto, T.
Right arrow Articles by Horie, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsutamoto, T.
Right arrow Articles by Horie, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2009. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Effect of simvastatin vs. rosuvastatin on adiponectin and haemoglobin A1c levels in patients with non-ischaemic chronic heart failure

Takayoshi Tsutamoto*, Masayuki Yamaji, Chiho Kawahara, Keizo Nishiyama, Masanori Fujii, Takashi Yamamoto and Minoru Horie

Department of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Seta-Tsukinowa, Otsu 520-2192, Japan

* Corresponding author. Tel: +81 77 548 2213, Fax: +81 77 543 5839, Email: tutamoto{at}belle.shiga-med.ac.jp


   Abstract

Aims: To compare the effects of lipophilic simvastatin and hydrophilic rosuvastatin on plasma adiponectin and glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels in patients with non-ischaemic chronic heart failure (NICHF).

Methods and results: Seventy-one stable outpatients with NICHF, who were already receiving standard therapy for CHF, were randomized to simvastatin (n = 35) or rosuvastatin (n = 36). Plasma levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), total adiponectin, high-sensitive C-reactive protein, HbA1c, and oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL), a marker of oxidative stress, were measured before and 4 months after treatment with simvastatin or rosuvastatin. There was no difference in the baseline characteristics including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and biochemical parameters between the two groups. In both groups, plasma BNP levels and LVEF did not change after 4 months. Plasma levels of adiponectin and oxLDL did not change and HbA1c level was slightly increased (6.0 ± 0.9 vs. 6.1 ± 0.9%, P = 0.053) in the simvastatin group. In contrast, plasma adiponectin level was significantly increased (12.3 ± 7.3 vs. 14.0 ± 8.2 µg/mL, P = 0.012) concomitant with a significant reduction in oxLDL and HbA1c (oxLDL: 8.8 ± 4.7 vs. 7.6 ± 4.7 U/mL, P = 0.0059; HbA1c: 6.0 ± 0.7 vs. 5.9 ± 0.7%, P = 0.002) in the rosuvastatin group.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that hydrophilic rosuvastatin but not lipophilic simvastatin increases adiponectin and decreases HbA1c levels in patients with NICHF.

Key Words: Heart failure • Statin • Glycated haemoglobin • Adiponectin • Brain natriuretic peptide

Received May 12, 2009; Revised August 7, 2009; Accepted September 9, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.