Skip Navigation



European Journal of Heart Failure Advance Access published online on October 29, 2009

European Journal of Heart Failure, doi:10.1093/eurjhf/hfp143
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/12/1208    most recent
hfp143v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mendoza, H.
Right arrow Articles by Cia, J. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mendoza, H.
Right arrow Articles by Cia, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2009. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

‘Hospital at home’ care model as an effective alternative in the management of decompensated chronic heart failure

Humberto Mendoza1,{dagger}, María Jesús Martín2, Angel García3, Fernando Arós4, Felipe Aizpuru5, José Regalado De Los Cobos3,*, María Concepción Belló4, Pedro Lopetegui2 and Juan Miguel Cia3

1 Internal Medicine Service of Hospital Nuestra Señora de Sonsoles, Ávila, Spain
2 Emergency Department, Hospital Txagorritxu, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
3 Unidad de Hospitalización a Domicilio, Hospital at Home Unit, Hospital Txagorritxu and Hospital Santiago Apóstol, Atxotegi, no. s/n, 01009 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
4 Cardiology Department, Hospital Txagorritxu, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
5 Health Research Unit, Basque Health Service, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain

* Corresponding author. Tel: +34 945 007276, Fax: +34 945 007271/07272, Email: jose.regaladodeloscobos{at}osakidetza.net


   Abstract

Aims: The ‘Hospital at home’ (HaH) model avoids hospital admission by transferring healthcare and treatment to the patient's home. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and direct healthcare costs of treating elderly patients with decompensated heart failure (HF) using HaH care vs. inpatient hospital care (IHC) in a cardiology unit.

Methods and results: Eighty patients aged over 65 years who presented at the emergency department with decompensated HF were randomly assigned to IHC or HaH. All patients were studied for 1 year. Seventy-one patients completed the study, of these 34 were admitted to cardiology and 37 received HaH care. No significant differences were found in baseline characteristics, including comorbidity, functional status, and health-related quality of life. Clinical outcomes were similar after initial admission and also after the 12 months of follow-up. Death or re-admission due to HF or another cardiovascular event occurred in 19 patients in IHC and 20 in HaH (P = 0.88). Changes in functional status and health-related quality of life over the follow-up period were not significantly different. The average cost of the initial admission was 4502 ± 2153{euro} in IHC and 2541 ± 1334{euro} in HaH (P < 0.001). During 12 months of follow-up, the average expenditure was 4619 ± 7679{euro} and 3425 ± 4948{euro} (P = 0.83) respectively.

Conclusion: Hospital at home care allows an important reduction in the costs during the index episode compared with hospital care, whilst maintaining similar outcomes with respect to cardiovascular mortality and morbidity and quality of life at 1 year follow-up.

Key Words: Hospital at home • Effectiveness • Healthcare cost • Heart failure

Received March 30, 2009; Revised June 30, 2009; Accepted August 30, 2009


{dagger} Ex-memeber of the Hospital at Home Unit of Vitoria-Gasteiz.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.