Skip Navigation

European Journal of Heart Failure 2007 9(2):191-196; doi:10.1016/j.ejheart.2006.05.015
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Juhlin, T.
Right arrow Articles by Höglund, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Juhlin, T.
Right arrow Articles by Höglund, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2007 European Society of Cardiology

Treatments with losartan or enalapril are equally sensitive to deterioration in renal function from cyclooxygenase inhibition

Tord Juhlina, Leif R. Erhardta, Helene Ottossonb, Bo A.G. Jönssonb and Peter Höglundc,*

a Department of Cardiology, Malmö University Hospital Malmö, Sweden
b Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University Hospital Lund, Sweden
c Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Lund University Hospital S-221 85 Lund, Sweden

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +46 46 177979; fax: +46 46 176085. E-mail address: Peter.Hoglund{at}skane.se


   Abstract

Background: The beneficial effects of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors are in part mediated through the inhibition of the degradation of the vasodilator bradykinin. The bradykinin effect is counteracted by cyclooxygenase-inhibitors. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) do not affect bradykinin.

Aims: To test the hypothesis that renal counteraction from a cyclooxygenase-inhibitor, diclofenac, is different in subjects treated with an ACE-inhibitor, enalapril compared with an ARB, losartan.

Methods: Twelve elderly, healthy, slightly over-hydrated subjects received diclofenac orally after pre-treatment with a diuretic, bendroflumethiazide, and enalapril or bendroflumethiazide and losartan, in a double-blind cross-over fashion, with a wash-out period of at least 1 week.

Results: Diclofenac reduced GFR significantly from 81(64–98) ml/min at first observations after dose for enalapril to 29(16–42) and from 76(64–88) after losartan to 35(24–46). There was no significant difference between enalapril and losartan in GFR. Diclofenac induced decreases in urine flow, excretion rates and clearances of sodium, osmolality clearance and free water clearance, irrespective of treatment with enalapril or losartan. However, serum potassium and handling of potassium were significantly lower after losartan-treatment.

Conclusion: The negative renal effects of diclofenac administration in subjects with activation of the renin–angiotensin system and enalapril treatment are the same in subjects with activation of the renin–angiotensin system and losartan treatment.

Key Words: Heart failure • ACE-inhibition • Angiotensin receptor blockers • Cyclooxygenase inhibition • RAAS • Clinical trial • Renal function

Received November 2, 2004; Revised September 12, 2005; Accepted May 25, 2006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. Knobloch, H. Bedair, K. Uehara, F. H. Fu, and J. Huard
Letter to the Editor * Authors' Response
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2008; 36(12): e5 - e7.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
T. Juhlin, B. A.G. Jonsson, and P. Hoglund
Renal effects of aspirin are clearly dose-dependent and are of clinical importance from a dose of 160 mg
Eur J Heart Fail, September 1, 2008; 10(9): 892 - 898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.