Skip Navigation

European Journal of Heart Failure 2006 8(3):314-320; doi:10.1016/j.ejheart.2005.07.014
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rizzello, V.
Right arrow Articles by Bax, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rizzello, V.
Right arrow Articles by Bax, J. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 European Society of Cardiology

Benefits of coronary revascularisation in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy: Role of myocardial viability

Vittoria Rizzellob, Don Poldermansa,*, Elena Biaginia, Arend F.L. Schinkela, Eric Boersmaa, Abdou Elhendya, Fabiola B. Sozzia, Alexander Maata, Jos R.T.C. Roelandta and Jeroen J. Baxc

a Department of Cardiology Thoraxcenter Room Ba 300, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
b Department of Cardiology, The Catholic University Rome, Italy
c Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center Leiden, The Netherlands

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +31 10 4639222; fax: +31 10 4364957. E-mail address: d.poldermans{at}erasmusmc.nl


   Abstract

Background: Diabetes mellitus in patients with coronary artery disease is associated with poor outcome. In this study, the relation between myocardial viability, diabetes, coronary revascularisation and outcome was evaluated.

Methods: 129 patients (31 diabetic, 98 non-diabetic) with ischaemic cardiomyopathy underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography to assess myocardial viability. Patients with ≥4 viable segments were defined as viable and patients with <<4 viable segments as nonviable. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was assessed before and 9–12 months post-revascularisation. At the same time-points, LV volumes were measured to evaluate LV remodelling. Finally, cardiac events were noted during 5-year follow-up.

Results: The extent of viable myocardium was comparable between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. After revascularisation, LVEF increased ≥5% in 44% of diabetic and in 40% of non-diabetic patients. LVEF only improved in patients with viable myocardium. Ongoing LV remodelling occurred in 36% and 35% of diabetic and non-diabetic patients respectively, and was related to non-viability, whereas viability protected against ongoing LV remodelling, both in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Viability was the only predictor of survival after revascularisation.

Conclusions: Diabetic, viable patients with ischaemic LV dysfunction exhibit improvement in LVEF post-revascularisation with prevention of ongoing LV remodelling, similar to non-diabetic patients. Myocardial viability was also the only predictor of long-term outcome.

Key Words: Diabetes mellitus • Coronary artery disease • Myocardial viability • Coronary revascularisation • Ischaemic cardiomyopathy

Received March 27, 2005; Revised June 4, 2005; Accepted July 26, 2005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
L. Cortigiani, R. Sicari, A. Desideri, R. Bigi, F. Bovenzi, E. Picano, and on behalf of the VIDA (Viability Identification wi
Dobutamine stress echocardiography and the effect of revascularization on outcome in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with chronic ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction
Eur J Heart Fail, October 1, 2007; 9(10): 1038 - 1043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.