Skip Navigation

European Journal of Heart Failure 2005 7(5):768-779; doi:10.1016/j.ejheart.2005.01.018
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hobbs, F.D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hobbs, F.D. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 European Society of Cardiology

The diagnosis of heart failure in European primary care: The IMPROVEMENT Programme survey of perception and practice

F.D. Richard Hobbs*, Jerzy Korewicki, John G.F. Cleland, Joanne Eastaugh, Nick Freemantle and on behalf of the IMPROVEMENT Investigators

Primary Care Clinical Sciences Building University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom

* Corresponding author. E-mail address: f.d.r.hobbs{at}bham.ac.uk


   Abstract

Objective: To examine European primary care physicians (PCPs) views on diagnosis of heart failure and compare perceptions with actual practice.

Design: Semi-structured PCP interviews and case note review on a random sample of heart failure patients.

Participants: 1363 primary care physicians from 14 countries and 11,062 patient notes.

Main outcome measures: Perceptions of PCPs compared to actual performance in heart failure (HF) diagnosis.

Results: Over 50% of patients with HF were above 70 years of age. Most subjects presented with typical clinical symptoms and objective signs of HF. In 50% of cases, HF was mainly diagnosed by PCPs. New York Heart Association classification was used by 50% of physicians. Electrocardiogram and chest X-ray were the most used diagnostic tests (90% and 84% respectively). PCPs considered echocardiography as having low diagnostic value, with only 48% routine usage. However, in actual practice echocardiography was used in 82% of diagnoses. Systolic dysfunction was observed in 51% HF subjects, but only 50% of physicians would differentiate systolic from diastolic heart failure.

Conclusions: There was low use of NYHA classification (which denotes symptom severity) and differentiation between systolic and diastolic causes (which determines treatment strategies).

Key Words: Heart failure • Diagnosis • Primary care • Survey

Received June 25, 2004; Revised October 29, 2004; Accepted January 27, 2005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
U. Dahlstrom, J. Hakansson, K. Swedberg, and A. Waldenstrom
Adequacy of diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure in primary health care in Sweden
Eur J Heart Fail, January 1, 2009; 11(1): 92 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
W. J. Remme, J. J.V. McMurray, F.D. R. Hobbs, A. Cohen-Solal, J. Lopez-Sendon, A. Boccanelli, F. Zannad, B. Rauch, K. Keukelaar, C. Macarie, et al.
Awareness and perception of heart failure among European cardiologists, internists, geriatricians, and primary care physicians
Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2008; 29(14): 1739 - 1752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
I. Ekman, E. Kjork, and B. Andersson
Self-assessed symptoms in chronic heart failure -- Important information for clinical management
Eur J Heart Fail, April 1, 2007; 9(4): 424 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.