Skip Navigation

European Journal of Heart Failure 2003 5(3):319-326; doi:10.1016/S1388-9842(02)00237-4
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schröder, D.
Right arrow Articles by Klein, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schröder, D.
Right arrow Articles by Klein, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2002 European Society of Cardiology

Efficacy of a homeopathic Crataegus preparation compared with usual therapy for mild (NYHA II) cardiac insufficiency: results of an observational cohort study

D. Schrödera, M. Weiserb,* and P. Kleinc

a Börsenstrasse 17 Frankfurt/M, Germany
b Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH Baden-Baden, Germany
c Datenservice Eva Hönig GmbH Rohrbach, Germany

* Corresponding author. Postfach 100349, 76484 Baden-Baden, Germany. Tel.: +49-7221-501-291; fax: +49-7221-501-660. E-mail address: weiser.michael{at}heel.de


   Abstract

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of the homeopathic Crataegus preparation Cralonin for non-inferiority to standard treatment for mild cardiac insufficiency.

Methods: Multicentre non-randomised cohort study in patients aged 50–75 years in New York Heart Association class II. Patients received Cralonin (n=110) or ACE inhibitor/diuretics (n=102) for 8 weeks. To adjust for confounding by baseline factors, populations were stratified according to propensity score. After adjusting, there were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups. Treatment efficacy was assessed on 15 variables. A stringent non-inferiority criterion for the upper limit of the 97.5% one-sided confidence interval of the treatment difference was set to 0.2x the standard deviation (S.D.).

Results: Both treatment regimens improved scores on most variables studied, with the greatest effect on double product after exercise (average score reduction 15.4% with Cralonin vs. 16.0% for the control group). Stringent non-inferiority of Cralonin was demonstrated on 7 variables. Medium-stringent (0.5xS.D.) non-inferiority was indicated by 13 variables (exceptions: systolic blood pressure (BP) during exercise and diastolic BP at rest; for these, differences between treatments were not significant). Both treatments were well tolerated.

Conclusion: The Crataegus-based preparation Cralonin is non-inferior to usual ACE inhibitor/diuretics treatment for mild cardiac insufficiency on all parameters except BP reduction.

Key Words: AE, adverse event • BP, blood pressure • DBP, diastolic blood pressure • DP, double product • HR, heart rate • NYHA, New York Heart Association • PS, propensity score • QOL, quality of life • SBP, systolic blood pressure • SD, standard deviation • SEM, standard error of mean • tid, tris in diem, thrice daily

Received November 6, 2001; Revised April 24, 2002; Accepted June 24, 2002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
K. Lalukota, J. G.F. Cleland, L. Ingle, A. L. Clark, and A. P. Coletta
Clinical trials update from the Heart Failure Society of America: EMOTE, HERB-CHF, BEST genetic sub-study and RHYTHM-ICD
Eur J Heart Fail, December 1, 2004; 6(7): 953 - 955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
Dr.L. Zanolla
Letter to the editor
Eur J Heart Fail, June 1, 2004; 6(4): 509 - 509.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
A. L. Clark and A. Morice
Letter to the editor
Eur J Heart Fail, June 1, 2004; 6(4): 511 - 511.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
J. Niebauer
Letter to the editor
Eur J Heart Fail, June 1, 2004; 6(4): 513 - 513.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
S. D. Anker
Letter to the editor
Eur J Heart Fail, June 1, 2004; 6(4): 515 - 515.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
J. G.F. Cleland
Response from editor to letter to the editor--Alternative approaches to the management of heart failure: Editors response
Eur J Heart Fail, June 1, 2004; 6(4): 517 - 518.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.