Skip Navigation

European Journal of Heart Failure 2003 5(2):195-200; doi:10.1016/S1388-9842(02)00256-8
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bouvy, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hoes, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bouvy, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hoes, A. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2002 European Society of Cardiology

Patterns of pharmacotherapy in patients hospitalised for congestive heart failure

Marcel L. Bouvya,b,*, Eibert R. Heerdinka, Hubert G.M. Leufkensa and Arno W. Hoesc

a Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacotherapy, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS) P.O. Box 80082, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands
b SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice Research Leiden, The Netherlands
c Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +31-30-2537324; fax: +31-30-2539166 E-mail address: m.bouvy{at}pharm.uu.nl


   Abstract

Background: In the 1990s, a number of cardiovascular drugs were evaluated in randomised clinical trials. Treatment guidelines for heart failure were modified to include these evidence-based treatments.

Aim: To evaluate the impact of new medical treatments for heart failure between 1990 and 1998.

Methods and results: A retrospective cohort study of 2764 patients with a first hospital admission for heart failure between 1990 and 1998. The percentage of patients treated with different cardiovascular drugs after hospitalisation was calculated and compared over time. Use of loop diuretics remained steady approximately 80%, digoxin decreased from 57.6 to 42.7%, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors showed a slight increase from 49.8 to 54.8%, beta-blockers almost tripled from 11.3 to 28.7%, low dose prophylactic acetylsalicylic acid quadrupled from 9.9 to 39.9%. Kaplan–Meier survival estimates showed highest continuation rates of drug treatment for antithrombotics and diuretics, intermediate for digoxin and ACE inhibitors and low for beta-blockers. More than a quarter of the users discontinued beta-blockers in the first year after hospitalisation.

Conclusions: We observed an increase in the prescribing of several important drug classes, reflecting changes in treatment guidelines during the study period. However, our findings show that not all patients were receiving optimal treatment. More research into the reasons for this is warranted.

Key Words: ACE-inhibitors • Beta-blockers • Diuretics • Digoxin • Antithrombotics • Heart failure • Medication patterns • Persistence of therapy

Received April 15, 2002; Revised July 16, 2002; Accepted September 17, 2002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. H. Gislason, J. N. Rasmussen, S. Z. Abildstrom, T. K. Schramm, M. L. Hansen, P. Buch, R. Sorensen, F. Folke, N. Gadsboll, S. Rasmussen, et al.
Persistent Use of Evidence-Based Pharmacotherapy in Heart Failure Is Associated With Improved Outcomes
Circulation, August 14, 2007; 116(7): 737 - 744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
P. Roman-Sanchez, P. Conthe, J. Garcia-Alegria, J. Forteza-Rey, M. Montero, C. Montoto, and for the Heart Failure Working Group of the Spanish
Factors influencing medical treatment of heart failure patients in Spanish internal medicine departments: a national survey
QJM, February 1, 2005; 98(2): 127 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.