Skip Navigation

European Journal of Heart Failure 2001 3(3):365-371; doi:10.1016/S1388-9842(01)00132-5
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Varney, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Varney, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2001 European Society of Cardiology

A cost-effectiveness analysis of bisoprolol for heart failure

Susan Varney*

Imperial College School of Medicine, NHLI-Royal Brompton Campus Dovehouse Street, SW3 6LY, UK


   Abstract

Aims: This study considers the cost-effectiveness of bisoprolol in heart failure patients as an adjunctive therapy to usual treatment.

Methods and results: A cost-effectiveness model was constructed using data available from the CIBIS I & II trials and other secondary sources. Differences in patient survival rates were calculated for bisoprolol (n = 1327) and placebo groups (n = 1320) extrapolating data over a 5-year period, under limited and extended benefits scenarios to calculate life years gained (LYG). Hospitalisation rates were calculated using data from both CIBIS trials. Costs were considered under two different patient management protocols for treatment initiation — shared care by outpatient clinics and GPs and initiation by a nurse working in the community. Discounted LYG were calculated to be 0.228 under the limited benefits scenario and 0.368 under the extended benefits scenario. Under the extended benefits scenario shared care resulted in a cost of £268 per LYG or £412 per LYG for community initiation. Under the limited benefits scenario the costs were a £135 saving and £69, respectively.

Conclusion: This analysis has shown bisoprolol to be an economically attractive therapy in comparison with other treatments. It is hoped that its adoption by clinicians will be rapid, despite the labour intensive and time consuming up-titration process involved in its initiation.

Key Words: Cost-effective • Beta-blockers • Heart failure • Bisoprolol

Received August 14, 2000; Revised December 28, 2000; Accepted January 17, 2001


* Tel.: +44-20-7351-8700; fax: +44-20-7351-8733. E-mail address: s.varney{at}rbh.nthames.nhs.uk (S. Varney).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
D A Turner, S Paul, M A Stone, A Juarez-Garcia, I Squire, and K Khunti
Cost-effectiveness of a disease management programme for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease and heart failure in primary care
Heart, December 1, 2008; 94(12): 1601 - 1606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
M. Ledwidge, M. Barry, J. Cahill, E. Ryan, B. Maurer, M. Ryder, B. Travers, L. Timmons, and K. McDonald
Is multidisciplinary care of heart failure cost-beneficial when combined with optimal medical care?
Eur J Heart Fail, June 1, 2003; 5(3): 381 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
H. Krum and S. Lim
Pharmacoeconomics of beta-blockers: effective and cost-effective therapy in chronic heart failure
Eur J Heart Fail, August 1, 2001; 3(4): 399 - 402.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.