Skip Navigation

European Journal of Heart Failure 2001 3(2):249-255; doi:10.1016/S1388-9842(00)00144-6
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, S.
Right arrow Articles by McMurray, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, S.
Right arrow Articles by McMurray, J. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2001 European Society of Cardiology

Poles apart, but are they the same? A comparative study of Australian and Scottish patients with chronic heart failure

Simon Stewarta,b, Lynda Blueb, Simon Capewellc, John D. Horowitza and John J. McMurrayb,*

a Department of Cardiology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital / University of Adelaide Adelaide, Australia
b CRI in Heart Failure, Wolfson Building, University of Glasgow Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, UK
c Department of Public Health, University of Glasgow Glasgow, Scotland, UK

* Corresponding author. Tel./fax: +44-141-330-6588. E-mail address: j.mcmurray{at}bio.gla.ac.uk (J.J. McMurray).


   Abstract

This paper reports on an international comparison of the characteristics, treatment and health outcomes of chronic heart failure (CHF) patients discharged from acute hospital care in Australia and Scotland. The baseline characteristics and treatment of 200 CHF patients recruited to a randomised study of a non-pharmacological intervention in Australia and 157 CHF patients concurrently recruited to a similar study in Scotland were compared. Subsequent health outcomes (including survival and readmission) within 3 months of discharge in those patients who received usual post-discharge care in Australia (n = 100) and Scotland (n = 75) were also compared. Individuals in both countries were predominantly old and frail with significant comorbidity likely to complicate treatment. Similar proportions of Australian and Scottish patients were prescribed either a ‘high’ (20 vs. 18%) or medium (64 vs. 66%) dose of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. Proportionately more Australian patients were prescribed a long-acting nitrate, digoxin and/or a β-blocker. At 3 months post-discharge, 57 of the 100 (57%: 95% CI 47–67%) Australian and 37 of the 75 (49%: 95% CI 38–61%) Scottish patients assigned to ‘usual care’ remained event-free (NS). Similarly, 15 vs. 12% required ≥ 2 unplanned readmission (NS) and 16 vs. 19% of Australian and Scottish patients, respectively, died (NS). Australian and Scottish patients accumulated a median of 0.6 vs. 0.9 days, respectively, of hospitalisation/patient/month (NS). On multivariate analysis (including country of origin), unplanned readmission or death was independently correlated with severe renal impairment (adjusted odds ratio 4.4, P < 0.05), a previous hospitalisation for CHF (2.3, P < 0.05), longer index hospitalisation (2.7 for > 10 days, P < 0.05) and greater comorbidity (1.3 for each incremental unit of the Charlson Index, P = 0.05). Health outcomes among predominantly old and frail CHF patients appear to be independent of the health-care system in which the patient is managed and more likely to be dependent on the syndrome itself.

Key Words: Chronic heart failure • Pharmacology • Hospitalisation • Mortality

Received June 26, 2000; Revised September 6, 2000; Accepted November 3, 2000


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S. Stewart, L. Blue, A. Walker, C. Morrison, and J.J.V. Mcmurray
An economic analysis of specialist heart failure nurse management in the U.K. Can we afford not to implement it?
Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2002; 23(17): 1369 - 1378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Stewart and J. D. Horowitz
Home-Based Intervention in Congestive Heart Failure: Long-Term Implications on Readmission and Survival
Circulation, June 18, 2002; 105(24): 2861 - 2866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
S. Stewart and J. D. Horowitz
Detecting early clinical deterioration in chronic heart failure patients post-acute hospitalisation--a critical component of multidisciplinary, home-based intervention?
Eur J Heart Fail, June 1, 2002; 4(3): 345 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
S. Stewart, A. Jenkins, S. Buchan, A. McGuire, S. Capewell, and J. J.J.V. McMurray
The current cost of heart failure to the National Health Service in the UK
Eur J Heart Fail, June 1, 2002; 4(3): 361 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.