Skip Navigation

European Journal of Heart Failure 2000 2(3):265-271; doi:10.1016/S1388-9842(00)00065-9
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davey, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davey, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2000 European Society of Cardiology

QT interval lengthening in cardiac disease relates more to left ventricular systolic dysfunction than to autonomic function

Patrick Davey*

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford OX3 9DU, UK


   Abstract

Background: There are multiple influences on the QTc interval, including the autonomic nervous system. Which influence is the principal determinant of the variation in QTc interval between different cardiac diseases is not yet clear, though some studies have suggested that the QTc interval primarily reflects sympatho-vagal balance. This study investigated this claim further.

Aim: To determine if autonomic tone was the prime determinant of variation in the QTc interval between subjects with different cardiac diseases.

Methods: Subjects with different cardiac diseases were studied, QTc interval determined and correlated with three different measures of the autonomic nervous system, that of baroreflex sensitivity, catecholamine levels (epinephrine and norepinephrine) and sympatho-vagal balance as determined by power spectrum analysis.

Results: 47 subjects were studied, comprising 17 subjects with heart failure, 14 subjects with left ventricular hypertrophy and 16 control subjects. For the group as a whole there was no relationship between QTc interval and any measure of the autonomic nervous system function, but there was a reasonable relationship between fractional shortening and QTc interval (r = 0.47, P < 0.003). For subjects with an echocardiographic fractional shortenings less than 0.35 (which correlates with an ejection fraction of < 50%), a strong relationship between fractional shortening and QTc interval remained (r = 0.57, P < 0.002), but in addition a relationship between QTc interval and catecholamine levels developed (for epinephrine: r = 0.67, P < 0.002; and for norepinephrine: r = 0.62, P < 0.005). Multiple regression analysis showed that fractional shortening and epinephrine levels were independently related to QTc interval.

Conclusion: In subjects with a variety of cardiac diseases, the prime determinant of QTc interval is left ventricular systolic performance rather than the autonomic nervous system, though in subjects with low normal and less fractional shortenings catecholamine levels are independently related to QTc interval.

Received February 12, 1999; Revised January 19, 2000; Accepted February 16, 2000


* Tel.: +44-1865-741166; fax: +44-1865-220252. E-mail address: patrick.davey{at}ndm.ox.ac.uk (P. Davey).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
jvdiHome page
L. W. Woods, L. W. George, M. L. Anderson, D. M. Woods, M. S. Filigenzi, and B. Puschner
Evaluation of the toxicity of Adonis aestivalis in calves
J Vet Diagn Invest, September 1, 2007; 19(5): 581 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
K Y K Wong, R S M. Walter, D Douglas, H W Fraser, S A Ogston, and A D Struthers
Long QTc predicts future cardiac death in stroke survivors
Heart, April 1, 2003; 89(4): 377 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.