Skip Navigation

European Journal of Heart Failure 2009 11(9):818-824; doi:10.1093/eurjhf/hfp111
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Damy, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hittinger, L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Damy, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hittinger, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2009. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Comparison of four right ventricular systolic echocardiographic parameters to predict adverse outcomes in chronic heart failure

Thibaud Damy1,3,4,*, Caroline Viallet1, Olivier Lairez1, Guillaume Deswarte1, Alexandra Paulino1, Patrick Maison5, Emmanuelle Vermes6, Pascal Gueret1,4, Serge Adnot2,3,4, Jean-Luc Dubois-Randé1,3,4 and Luc Hittinger1,3,4

1 Fédération de cardiologie, AP-HP, Groupe Henri-Mondor Albert-Chenevier, 51 Avenue Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
2 Service de Physiologie–Explorations Fonctionnelles, AP-HP, Groupe Henri-Mondor Albert-Chenevier, Créteil, France
3 INSERM, Unité U955, Créteil F-94010, France
4 Université Paris 12, Faculté de Médecine, Créteil F-94010, France
5 Service de Pharmacologie Clinique and Unité, de Recherche Clinique, AP-HP, Groupe Henri-Mondor Albert-Chenevier, Créteil, France
6 Service de Chirurgie Cardio-thoracique, AP-HP, Groupe Henri-Mondor Albert-Chenevier, Créteil, France

* Corresponding author. Tel: 33 1 49 81 22 53, Fax: 33 1 49 81 42 24, Email: thibaud.damy{at}gmail.com


   Abstract

Aims: Heart failure (HF) has a poor prognosis. Several right ventricular (RV) echocardiographic parameters have been proposed as sensitive markers to detect patients at risk. Our objective was to compare the predictive value of four RV systolic echocardiographic parameters for outcomes in patients with HF.

Methods and results: One hundred and thirty-six patients with stable HF and a left ventricular ejection fraction <35% were assessed for the following: (i) RV fractional area (RVFA), (ii) tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), (iii) integral of the systolic wave (ISWtdi), and (iv) peak systolic velocity (PSVtdi). ISWtdi and PSVtdi were measured using tissue Doppler imaging at the tricuspid annulus. The primary endpoint was death, urgent transplantation, urgent ventricular assist device implantation, or an acute HF episode. During a mean follow-up of 295 days, 33 patients reached the primary endpoint. The cut-off thresholds for RVFA, TAPSE, PSVtdi, and ISWtdi defined using receiver-operating characteristic curves were 36.8%, 13.5 mm, 9.5 cm s–1, and 1.75 cm, respectively. On Cox multivariate analysis, NYHA, log BNP, and only PSVtdi from the RV systolic parameters were found to be independent predictors of outcome.

Conclusion: PSVtdi is a strong independent predictor of outcome in HF at a threshold value of 9.5 cm s–1 and appears to be superior to other RV systolic echocardiographic parameters.

Key Words: Congestive heart failure • Right ventricle • Echocardiography

Received February 10, 2009; Revised July 20, 2009;
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
D. Farmakis, J. Parissis, and D. T. Kremastinos
The prognostic role of echocardiographic indices in chronic heart failure: right ventricle revisited
Eur J Heart Fail, December 1, 2009; 11(12): 1220 - 1220.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.