Skip Navigation


European Journal of Heart Failure Advance Access originally published online on June 23, 2009
European Journal of Heart Failure 2009 11(8):779-788; doi:10.1093/eurjhf/hfp086
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
11/8/779    most recent
hfp086v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, A. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2009. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

A critical comparison of echocardiographic measurements used for optimizing cardiac resynchronization therapy: stroke distance is best

Dewi E. Thomas1,*, Zaheer R. Yousef2 and Alan G. Fraser1

1 Wales Heart Research Institute, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK
2 University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK

* Corresponding author. Tel: +44 29 2074 5287, Fax: +44 29 2074 3500, Email: drdethomas{at}yahoo.co.uk


   Abstract

Aims: Dyssynchrony assessment in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is controversial, and there are no standard protocols for optimizing treatment. We studied the feasibility and reproducibility of several echocardiographic measures to optimize CRT pacemaker settings. We also assessed the utility of ‘stroke distance’ [left ventricular outflow tract velocity–time integral (LVOT VTI)] in performing this function.

Methods and results: Thirty patients underwent the following functional assessments; 6 min walk test distance, peak VO2 consumption on cardiopulmonary exercise testing (VO2 peak), quality-of-life scoring, and echocardiography; before and at 3 and 6 months after implantation of the CRT device. At 3 months, patients received LVOT VTI-guided optimization of interventricular (VV) and atrioventricular (AV) delays. The feasibility and reproducibility of each optimization measurement was statistically analysed, and the functional benefits of optimization examined. Left ventricular outflow tract VTI, interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD), and tissue Doppler lateral-septal delay showed good feasibility (>90%), whereas LVOT VTI, IVMD, and the 12-segment tissue Doppler dyssynchrony index showed good reproducibility (coefficient of variation <20%). The most feasible and reproducible measure was LVOT VTI. Our optimization protocol necessitated alteration of AV and/or VV delays in 60% of patients at 3 months and was associated with a 50% improvement in functional responder status between 3 and 6 months.

Conclusion: Left ventricular outflow tract VTI provides us with a single, direct measure of global LV function which is robust, and easily applicable in routine clinical practice, and which is effective at improving response to CRT.

Key Words: Cardiac resynchronization therapy • Dyssynchrony • Echocardiography • Optimization • Stroke distance

Received December 29, 2008; Revised April 20, 2009; Accepted April 29, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
M. Bertini, V. Delgado, J. J. Bax, and N. R.L. Van de Veire
Why, how and when do we need to optimize the setting of cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Europace, November 1, 2009; 11(suppl_5): v46 - v57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.