Skip Navigation

European Journal of Heart Failure 2009 11(10):990-999; doi:10.1093/eurjhf/hfp116
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zick, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Aaronson, K. D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zick, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Aaronson, K. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2009. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Hawthorn Extract Randomized Blinded Chronic Heart Failure (HERB CHF) Trial

Suzanna M. Zick1,3,{dagger},*, Bonnie Motyka Vautaw2,5, Brenda Gillespie2,4 and Keith D. Aaronson3

1 Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, 1018 Fuller St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0708, USA
2 Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
3 Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
4 The Center for Statistical Consulting and Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
5 Ford Motor Credit Company, Dearborn, MI, USA

* Corresponding author. Tel: +1 734 998 7715, Fax: +1 734 998 0020, Email: szick{at}umich.edu


   Abstract

Aims: Hawthorn's efficacy when added to contemporary evidence-based heart failure therapy is unknown. We aimed to determine whether hawthorn increases submaximal exercise capacity when added to standard medical therapy.

Methods and results: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 120 ambulatory patients aged ≥18 years with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-III chronic heart failure. All patients received conventional medical therapy, as tolerated, and were randomized to either hawthorn 450 mg twice daily or placebo for 6 months. The primary outcome was change in 6 min walk distance at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included quality of life (QOL) measures, peak oxygen consumption, and anaerobic threshold during maximal treadmill exercise testing, NYHA classification, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), neurohormones, and measures of oxidative stress and inflammation. There were no significant differences between groups in the change in 6 min walk distance (P = 0.61), or on measures of QOL, functional capacity, neurohormones, oxidative stress, or inflammation. A modest difference in LVEF favoured hawthorn (P = 0.04). There were significantly more adverse events reported in the hawthorn group (P = 0.02), although most were non-cardiac.

Conclusion: Hawthorn provides no symptomatic or functional benefit when given with standard medical therapy to patients with heart failure.

This trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00343902 [ClinicalTrials.gov] .

Key Words: Hawthorn • Crataegus • Heart failure • Systolic

Received June 15, 2009; Revised July 20, 2009; Accepted July 23, 2009


{dagger} S.M.Z. had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.