Skip Navigation

European Journal of Heart Failure 2008 10(3):273-280; doi:10.1016/j.ejheart.2008.02.007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cazeau, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Paul, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cazeau, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Paul, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 European Society of Cardiology

Responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy with narrow or intermediate QRS complexes identified by simple echocardiographic indices of dyssynchrony: The DESIRE study

Serge J. Cazeaua,*, J-Claude Daubertb, Luigi Tavazzic, Gerd Frohligd and Vince Paule

a Inparys Clinical Research Group 12 rue Pasteur, 92210 — St. Cloud, France
b University Hospital Rennes, France
c IRCCS Policlinico S Matteo Pavia, Italy
d Universitätskliniken des Saarlandes Homburg, Germany
e St Peters Hospital Chertsey, United Kingdom

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +33 1 41 12 07 13; fax: +33 1 41 12 07 15. E-mail address: SergeCaz{at}aol.com (S.J. Cazeau).


   Abstract

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is recommended for patients with NYHA class III–IV refractory heart failure (HF), ejection fraction <35% and a QRS >120ms. We attempted to identify responders to CRT from echocardiographic (echo) indices of mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with QRS < 150 ms.

Methods and results: The study enrolled 51 men and 9 women (mean age: 64.5years) in NYHA class III (n=54) or IV (n=6) presenting with a mean ejection fraction: 25.7%, LV end-diastolic diameter: 69.1mm, and QRS = 121 ± 19 ms. All patients were implanted with a CRT system and followed for 1year. Implantation was preceded and followed by clinical, functional and Doppler (D)-echo evaluation. The primary combined endpoint included 1) death from any cause, 2) HF-related hospitalisations, and 3) NYHA class at 6 months. Before implant, 27 patients had ≥ 1 echo criterion of mechanical dyssynchrony (DES+ group) and 33 had no evidence of dyssynchrony (DES– group). At 12months, 8 patients (4 per group) had died, 7 from HF. As regards the primary endpoint at 6 months, 33 patients (55%) had improved, 10 (16%) were unchanged, and 17 (29%) had deteriorated. Clinical improvement was observed in 19 of 27 DES+ (70%), versus 14 of 33 DES– (42%) patients (P<0.04). Baseline QRS duration did not predict response to CRT.

Conclusions: In this population of HF patients with QRS < 150 ms, the presence of mechanical dyssynchrony at baseline D-echo examination, but not the QRS width, predicted 6-month clinical response to CRT.

Key Words: Cardiac resynchronization therapy • Cardiac mechanical dyssynchrony • QRS duration

Received November 2, 2007; Revised January 28, 2008; Accepted February 6, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
A. Auricchio and F. F. Faletra
Mechanical dyssynchrony in CRT patients: Still searching for the Holy Grail!
Eur J Heart Fail, March 1, 2008; 10(3): 217 - 219.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.