Skip Navigation

European Journal of Heart Failure 2008 10(10):1026-1032; doi:10.1016/j.ejheart.2008.07.018
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Göhler, A.
Right arrow Articles by Siebert, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Göhler, A.
Right arrow Articles by Siebert, U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 European Society of Cardiology

Decision-analytic evaluation of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of management programmes in chronic heart failure

Alexander Göhlera,b,c, Annette Conrads-Franka,c, Stewart S. Worrella, Benjamin P. Geislera,c, Elkan F. Halperna, Rainer Dietzb, Stefan D. Ankerb, G. Scott Gazellea,d and Uwe Sieberta,c,d,*

a Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, USA
b Division of Cardiology, Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum Berlin, Germany
c Department for Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, University for Health Science, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall i.T. Austria
d Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health Boston, USA

* Corresponding author. Cardiovascular Research Program, MGH Institute for Technology Assessment, Harvard Medical School, 101 Merrimac Street, 10th Floor, Boston, MA 02114-4724, USA. Tel.: +1 617 724 4445; fax: +1 617 726 9414. E-mail address: usiebert{at}hsph.harvard.edu (U. Siebert).


   Abstract

Background and aims: While management programmes (MPs) for chronic heart failure (CHF) are clinically effective, their cost-effectiveness remains uncertain. Thus, this study sought to determine the cost-effectiveness of MPs.

Methods and results: We developed a Markov model to estimate life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy, lifetime costs, and the incremental cost-effectiveness of MPs as compared to standard care. Standard care was defined by the EuroHeart Failure Survey for Germany, MP efficacy was derived from our recent meta-analysis and cost estimates were based on the German healthcare system. For a population with a mean age 67 years (35% female) at onset of CHF, our model predicted an average quality-adjusted life expectancy of 2.64 years for standard care and 2.83 years for MP. MP yielded additional lifetime costs of {euro}1700 resulting in an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of {euro}8900 (95% CI: dominant to 177,100) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the ICUR was sensitive to age and sex.

Conclusion: MPs increase life expectancy in patients with CHF by an average of 84 days and increase lifetime cost of care by approximately {euro}1700. MPs improve outcomes in a cost-effective manner, although they are not cost-saving on a lifetime horizon.

Key Words: Hearth failure • Management programme • Cost-effectiveness analysis • Markov model

Received October 27, 2007; Revised April 30, 2008; Accepted July 24, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
G. T. Schumock and A. S. Pickard
Comparative effectiveness research: Relevance and applications to pharmacy
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., July 15, 2009; 66(14): 1278 - 1286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.